Vedric
Join the waitlist
SOLUTIONS

Four people have to live with this platform.

Vedric is designed for the four roles that actually use insider-risk tooling day-to-day. Each of them needs a different thing from the same product. This page is the honest version of what changes for each, and what stays the same.

FEATURED SCENARIO

The employee collecting material the week before they resign.

This is the canonical insider case. No unauthorized access, no malware, no credential abuse, just a user, with legitimate access to their own material, whose patterns quietly change during their last two weeks. The full timeline lives on the Use Cases page; the four cards below are how four different roles read the same scenario.

WHO USES VEDRIC

Built for the people who have to defend the decision.

CISO

"I need defensible insider-risk coverage without keystroke-surveillance theater."

You answer to a board, an auditor, and a workforce, and the three audiences want opposite things. The board wants assurance that insider rehearsal is covered. The auditor wants evidence the coverage exists. The workforce wants a guarantee they are not being watched. Most insider-risk tools force you to pick two.

WHAT CHANGES WITH VEDRIC

The story you can tell in the boardroom is the same story you can tell in the all-hands. Coverage is built primarily on behavioral shape against the identity’s own long-term baseline, with one disclosed bounded PowerShell script-preview surface. The defensible answer starts with stating that exception plainly.

WHAT STAYS THE SAME

Vedric does not replace your SIEM, EDR, or DLP. It sits next to those tools and reads what they were never built to read.

COMPLIANCE OFFICER

"I need an audit trail with collection I can disclose precisely."

Your regulators want evidence that internal misuse is detectable. Your employment counsel and works council need a precise inventory of what is captured, including the bounded PowerShell preview, before anything goes live.

WHAT CHANGES WITH VEDRIC

Most signals are reproducible from behavioral metadata. Where PowerShell script evidence is present, it is explicitly labeled, truncated, and best-effort redacted. The audit trail and privacy notice can therefore describe the same real collection surface.

WHAT STAYS THE SAME

Vedric does not replace your existing legal-hold, eDiscovery, or content-DLP processes. When a case requires content review, those tools still run - Vedric just tells you which case is worth opening.

DETECTION ENGINEERING

"I need a system that does not drown me in alerts I have to manually tune away."

You have lived through the rule-pack era: hundreds of generic detections, all of them firing on day one, and a full-time tuning ticket queue. By month three, the team writes a Slack channel just for muting things. The product was supposed to help.

WHAT CHANGES WITH VEDRIC

Vedric tunes itself to each environment by learning that environment’s shape over time. The alerts that reach you are correlated storylines - multiple independent baselines disagreeing with normal for the same identity. Tuning becomes a review step.

WHAT STAYS THE SAME

You still own the runbook. Vedric does not auto-contain, auto-disable, or auto-notify HR. The system surfaces the storyline; the decision about what to do with it stays with your team.

INCIDENT RESPONSE

"I need the chronology already assembled when I land on a case."

When the page goes off, the first hour is reconstruction. A flat event stream leaves you assembling the story by hand. You spend the early lead-time of an incident doing the work the platform should have done before it paged you.

WHAT CHANGES WITH VEDRIC

Vedric pages with a storyline already assembled: which identity, which baselines disagreed, over which days, in which sequence. The case opens with the chronology in place. That first hour goes to the decision.

WHAT STAYS THE SAME

Vedric is not a forensic artifact collector and not a memory-image tool. When the case escalates to deep forensics, your existing IR stack still does that work - Vedric just shortens the road to the decision that the case needs deep forensics.

Bring it to the room that has to sign off.

If you’re one of the four roles above, we’d rather hear what you actually need than guess. Early access is reviewed manually; no automated sales sequences.

Join the waitlistTalk to security teamResponse within one business day.